home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- On Mon, 11 Mar 1996, Johan Klockars wrote:
-
- > > > This makes a great sence ofcourse. What about these two mailing lists
- > > > that we where talking about? One for nearly programing only and
- > > > nearly stuff, and one for those that comes with briliant id=E9as etc, but
- > ...
- > > Yes, I would say that this would be a solution. It would then be very easy
- >
- > I've asked for opinions about this several times, but no significant
- > interest has ever been shown. I could have the new list running in five
- > minutes if we decide it's a good idea (or should that be BAD idea? ;-).
- >
- > So, once more:
- > What do you all think about this?
- > Would you subscribe to both lists anyway?
-
- I would subscribe both lists. Though I'm not completely up to date
- regarding the programming I still like to read about it and study
- the source code. And I also like the general discussions.
-
- > And also:
- > Should the current list turn into a programming list and a new one be
- > started for more general discussions?
-
- If it's really necessary - yes, I think that would be the best.
-
- > What should the name be of the alternate list?
- > bm_prog? bm_talk?
-
- Sounds right. But still I'm puzzled - Why does people wan't the list
- separated ?
-
- For me, the borders between prog.talk and general are floating, since
- many ideas spring out from socalled non-technical talk.
-
- By the way, excuse me for my ignorance, but what is QLem for a program ??
-
- Keep Cool and Flying...
-
- ChainXOR...
-
-